Douglas Biber
Academic Articles
|
|
Douglas Biber |
(* marks publications in major refereed journals)
148. Biber, D., and C. Vásquez. 2008. Writing and Speaking. In C. Bazerman (ed.), Handbook of research on writing, 535-548. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
147. Biber, D., and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2007. Dimensions of register variation in Spanish. In G. Parodi (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora, 54-89. London: Continuum.
146. Tracy-Ventura, N., D. Biber, and V. Cortes. 2007. Lexical bundles in Spanish speech and writing. In G. Parodi (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora, 217-231. London: Continuum.
145. Biber, D. 2007. Representativeness in corpus design. In T. Fontenelle (Ed.), Practical lexicography: A reader, 63-88. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
144. Biber, D. 2007. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. V), 130-141. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 2003 article in New media discourse]
143. Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen, P. Byrd, and M. Helt. 2007. Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. V), 3-41. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 2002 article in TESOL Quarterly]
142. Biber, D. 2007. Representativeness in corpus design. In W. Teubert and R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. II), 134-165. London: Routledge. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
141. Biber, D. 2007. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies [Vol. 1], 127-157. London: Sage.
[Reprint of 1992 article in Discourse Processes]
140. *Biber, D., and F. Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26.263-86.
139. Biber, D., and J. Kurjian. 2007. Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, and C. Biewer (eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web, 109-132. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
138. *Biber, D. 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5.97-116.
137. Quaglio, P., and D. Biber. 2006. The grammar of conversation. In B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 692-723. Oxford: Blackwell.
136. *Biber, D., M. Davies, J. K. Jones, and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2006. Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora 1.7-38.
135. Biber, D. 2006. Register: Overview. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd Ed.), Vol 10, 476-482. Oxford: Elsevier.
134. Biber, D. 2006. Corpus-based parsing and grammatical description. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd Ed.), Vol 9, 197-205. Oxford: Elsevier.
133. *Biber, D., and J.K. Jones. 2005. Merging corpus linguistic and discourse analytic research goals: Discourse units in biology research articles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1.151-182.
132. Biber, D. 2005. What can corpus linguistics tell us about English grammar? TESOL Applied Linguistics Forum 26.1-8.
131. Biber, D. 2005. Corpus linguistics and the study of English grammar. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching 1.1-21.
130. Biber, D. 2005. Paquetes léxicos en textos de estudio universitario: Variación entre disciplinas académicas. Revista signos 38.19-29.
129. *Biber, D., S. Conrad, and V. Cortes. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25.371-405.
128. Conrad, S. and D. Biber. 2004. The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation
and academic prose. Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography 20.56-71.
127. Biber, D., E. Csomay, J.K. Jones, and C. Keck. 2004. A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In U. Connor and T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective, 53-72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
126. *Biber, D. 2004. Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.107-135.
125. Biber, D. 2004. Representativeness in corpus design. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening perspective, 174-97. London: Continuum.
[Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
124. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 2004. Historical drift in three English genres. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening perspective, 67-77. London: Continuum. [Reprint of 1987 article in Kyto, Ihalainen, and Rissanen (eds.)]
123. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2004. Corpus-based comparisons of registers. In C. Coffin, A. Hewings, and K.A. O’Halloran (eds.), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches, 40-56. London: Hodder Arnold.
122. Biber, D., E. Csomay, J.K. Jones, and C.M. Keck. 2004. Vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In A. Partington, J. Morley, and L. Haarman (eds.), Corpora and Discourse, 23-40. Bern: Peter Lang.
121. Keck, C.M. and D. Biber. 2004. Modal use in spoken and written university registers: A corpus-based study. In Roberta Facchinetti and Frank Palmer (eds.), English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies, 3-25. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
120. Biber, D. 2004. Lexical bundles in academic speech and writing. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Practical applications in language corpora (PALC 2003), 165-78. Hamburg: Peter Lang.
119. Biber, D. 2004. Modal use across registers and time. In Anne Curzan and Kimberly Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, 189-216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
118. Biber, D. 2004. Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon, and Anne Dister (eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, 15-34. Louvain: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
117. *Kretzschmar, William A., Clayton Darwin, Cati Brown, Donald L. Rubin, and D. Biber. 2004. Looking for the smoking gun: Principled sampling in creating the tobacco industry documents corpus. Journal of English Linguistics 32.31-47.
116. Biber, D., S. Conrad, V. Cortes. 2003. Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson, and Tony McEnery (eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 71-92. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
115. Biber, D. 2003. Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multi-dimensional analysis. In Charles Meyer and Pepi Leistyna (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 47-70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
114. Biber, D. 2003. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In J. Aitchison and D. Lewis (eds.), New media discourse. Routledge.
113. Biber, D. 2003. Review of: Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25. 463-4.
112. *Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen, P. Byrd, and M. Helt. 2003. Strengths and goals of multi-dimensional analysis: A response to Ghadessy. TESOL Quarterly 37.151-55.
111. *Biber, D., R. Reppen, and S. Conrad. 2002. Developing linguistic literacy: Perspectives from corpus linguistics and multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Child Language 29.449-488.
110. Biber, D. and V. Clark. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Teresa Fanego, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso, and Javier Perez-Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 43-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
109. *Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen, P. Byrd, and M. Helt. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36.9-48.
108. *Biber, D.. and R. Reppen. 2002. What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24.199-208.
107. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2001. Register variation: A corpus approach. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis,
175-96. Oxford: Blackwell.
106. Finegan. E., and D. Biber. 2001. Register variation and social dialect variation: The register axiom. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 235-67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. *Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 2001. Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly 35.331-6.
104. Biber, D. 2001. Corpus linguistics and the study of English grammar. English Corpus Studies 8.1-18.
103. Biber, D. 2001. Dimensions of variation among 18th century registers. In H-J. Diller and M. Gorlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 89-110. Heidelberg: C. Winter. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 200-214.)
102. Biber, D. 2001. Using corpus-based methods to investigate grammar and use: Some case studies on the use of verbs in English. In R. Simpson and J. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 101-15. University of Michigan Press.
101. Biber, D., Randi Reppen, Victoria Clark, and Jenia Walter. 2001. Representing spoken language in university settings: The design and construction of the spoken component of the T2K-SWAL Corpus. In R. Simpson and J. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 48-57. University of Michigan Press.
100. Reppen, R., and D. Biber. 2001. Habeas corpus, but will you be using it in class? EL Gazette, February issue (TESOL Special), page 1.
99. *Biber, D. 2001. Review of: Vihla, Minna. Medical writing: Modality in focus. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2.175-6.
98. Biber, D. 2000. Reprezentativnost v projektu korpusu. In: Studie z korpusove lingvistiky, ed. by F. Cermak, J. Klimova, and V. Petkevic, 107-36. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze. [Translation of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
97. *Biber, D., and J. Burges. 2000. Historical change in the language use of women and men: Gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics 28.21-37. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 157-170.)
96. Conrad, S., and D. Biber. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Evaluation in text, ed. by S. Hunston and G. Thompson, 56-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95. Biber, D. 2000. Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. In Usage based models of language, ed. by M. Barlow and S. Kemmer, 287-314. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [Reprint of 1996 article in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics]
94. Biber, D. 2000. Using corpora to investigate the lexical associations of related words. Japanese Association of English Corpus Studies Newsletter. Itabashi, Japan.
93. Conrad, S., and D. Biber, D. 2000. What you need to know about academic writing: Part 2. EL Gazette, June issue, page 10.
92. Biber, D. and S. Conrad. 2000. What you need to know about academic writing: Part 1. EL Gazette, May issue, page 8.
91. *Biber, D. 1999. A register perspective on grammar and discourse: Variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. Discourse Studies 1.131-150.
90. *Biber, D. 1999. Review of: Ludovic, Lebart, Andre Salem, and Lisette Berry. Exploring textual data. Computational Linguistics 25.165-6.
89. Biber, D. 1999. Review of: Westergren, Margareta. Contraction in British newspapers in the late 20th century. Studia Neophilologica 71.262-3.
88. Biber, D. 1999. Want to and know that: Complementation patterns in speech and academic writing. Longman Language Review 5.15-21.
87. Biber, D., and S. Conrad. 1999. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by Hilde Hasselgard and Signe Oksefjell, 181-90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
86. Biber, D. 1999. Corpus-based analysis of grammar: Variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. In Mireille Bilger (ed.), Questions de methode dans la linguistique sur corpus. Perpignan: Universite de Perpignan.
85. Biber, D., and R. Reppen. 1998. Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In Learner English on Computer, ed. by Sylviane Granger, 145-158. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
84. Biber, D. and J. Jamieson. 1998. Final report: Pilot study to test the influence of linguistic variables on listening and reading test performance. Technical Report, Educational Testing Service. (24 pages)
83. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by T. Nevalainen and L. Kahlas-Tarkka, 253-275. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 66-83.)
82. Finegan. E., and D. Biber. 1997. Relative markers in English: Fact and fancy. In From AElfric to the New York Times: Studies in English corpus linguistics, ed. by U. Fries, V. M eq \O(u,")ller, and P. Schneider, 65-78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
81. Biber, D. 1997. Lexical bundles in spoken and written discourse: What the grammar books don't tell you. In An update on grammar: How it is learnt - How it is taught (1996 Colloquium Proceedings), ed. by S.B. Gerome, 4-8. Paris: TESOL France.
80. *Biber, D. 1996. Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1.171-197.
79. Biber, D., S. Conrad, and R. Reppen. 1996. Corpus-based investigations of language use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 16.115-136.
78. Biber, D. 1996. Corpus revolutionises how we view language. EL Gazette, October issue, page 5.
77. Grabe, W., and D. Biber. 1996. Written language: English. In Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research, ed. by H. G eq \O(u,")nther and O. Ludwig, 1495-1499. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
76. *Biber, D. 1995. On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson (1994). Text 15.341-370.
75. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1995. That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650-1990. In The verb in contemporary English, ed. by B. Aarts and C. Meyer, 241-257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Biber, D. 1995. Cross-linguistic evidence concerning the linguistic correlates of literacy. In Organization in discourse, ed. by B. Warvik, S. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen, 1-14. University of Turku Press.
73. Biber, D. 1995. Representativeness in corpus design. Linguistica Computazionale IX-X.377-407. [Reprint of 1993 article in Literary and Linguistic Computing]
72. *Biber, D. 1995. Review of: Street, Brian V. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Language in Society 24.447-451.
71. Biber, D. 1994. Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. In: Using Large Corpora, ed. by S. Armstrong, 179-201. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press. [Reprint of 1993 article in Computational Linguistics]
70. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Multi-dimensional analyses of authors' styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. Research in Humanities Computing 3, ed. by D. Ross and D. Brink, 3-17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. *Biber, D., S. Conrad, R. Reppen. 1994. Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 15.169-189.
68. Biber, D., E. Finegan, and D. Atkinson. 1994. ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. In Creating and using English language corpora, ed. by U. Fries, G. Tottie and P. Schneider, 1-14. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
67. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Corpus-based research into language, ed. by N. Oostdijk and P. de Haan, 201-222. Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 108-123.)
66. Biber, D., E. Finegan, D. Atkinson, A. Beck, D. Burges, and J. Burges. 1994. The Design and Analysis of the ARCHER Corpus: A Progress Report. In Corpora across the centuries, ed. by M. Kyto, M. Rissanen, and S. Wright, 3-6. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
(Research articles #60 - #65 published In Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, ed. by D. Biber and E. Finegan, OUP)
65. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1994. Introduction: Situating register in sociolinguistics. Pp. 3-12.
64. Biber, D. 1994. An analytical framework for register studies. Pp. 31-56.
63. Kim, Y-J., and D. Biber. 1994. A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. Pp. 157-181.
62. Biber, D., and M. Hared. 1994. Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. Pp. 182-216.
61. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1994. Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. Pp. 315-347.
60. Atkinson, D., and D. Biber. 1994. Register: A review of empirical research. Pp. 351-385.
59. *Biber, D. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8.243-257.
58. *Biber, D. 1993. Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: A tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition. Computational Linguistics 19.549-556.
57. *Biber, D. 1993. Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics 19.219-241.
(Reprinted in: Using Large Corpora, ed. by S. Armstrong (1994),
179-201. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press.)
56. *Biber, D. 1993. The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities 26.331-345.
55. Biber, D. 1993. Review of: Macaulay, Marcia I. Processing varieties in English: An examination of oral and written speech across genres. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37.67-69.
54. Biber, D. 1993. Review of: Giles, Howard, and Nikolas Coupland. Language: Contexts and consequences. Language 69.856-857.
53. Biber, D. 1992. Experimental evidence concerning the acquisition of a Somali discourse rule. In Proceedings of the First International Congress of Somali Studies, ed. by H. M. Adam and C.L. Geshekter, 398-423. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.
52. Biber, D. and E. Finegan. 1992. The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, ed. by M. Rissanen, et al, 688-704. Berlin: Mouton.
51. Biber, D. 1992. Using computer-based text corpora to analyze the referential strategies of spoken and written texts. Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, edited by Jan Svartvik, pp. 213-252. Berlin: Mouton.
50. *Biber, D., and M. Hared. 1992. Dimensions of register variation in Somali. Language Variation and Change 4.41-75.
49. *Biber, D. 1992. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes 15.133-163. (Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (eds.) (2001), 215-240.)
48. Biber, D. and M. Hared. 1992. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12.260-282.
47. Biber, D. 1992. Somali. Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 4.25-27.
46. *Biber, D. 1992. Review of: Johansson, Stig, and Anna-Brita Stenstr eq \O(o,")m (eds.). English computer corpora: Selected papers and research guide. Computational Linguistics 18.549-551.
45. *Biber, D. 1991. Oral and literate characteristics of selected primary school reading materials. Text 11.73-96. (Special issue on Studies of orality and literacy: Critical issues for the practice of schooling, ed. by R. Horowitz.)
44. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1991. On the exploitation of computerized corpora in variation studies. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 204-220. London: Longman.
43. Biber, D. 1991. Computational applications in applied linguistics. In W. Grabe and R.B. Kaplan (eds.), Introduction to applied linguistics, 257-278. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
42. Biber, D. 1991. Review of: Stig Johansson and Knut Hofland. Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar. Language 67.406-7.
41. Biber, D. 1991. Review of: Ulrich Ammon (ed.). Status and function of languages and language varieties. Language 67.388-9.
40. Biber, D. 1991. Review of: Vit Bubenik. Hellenistic and Roman Greece as a sociolinguistic area. Language 67.391-2.
39. Biber, D. 1991. Review of: Garside, Roger, et al. (eds.). The computational analysis of English. Lingua 386.307-309.
38. *Biber, D. 1990. Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5.257-269.
37. Biber, D. 1990. Review of: Willem Meijs (ed.). Advances in corpora linguistics. Linguistics 28.584-586.
36. *Biber, D. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27.3-43.
35. *Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65.487-517.
34. *Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9.93-124. (special issue on The pragmatics of affect, ed. by Elinor Ochs).
33. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1989. Historical drift in three English genres. In Synchronic and diachronic approaches to linguistic variation and change (GURT '88), ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, pp. 22-36. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
32. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1989. Problems in the automatic grammatical tagging of seventeenth-century English texts. ICAME Journal 13.49.
31. *Biber, D. 1989. Review of: John I. Saeed. The syntax of focus and topic in Somali.; John I. Saeed. Somali reference grammar.; Virginia Luling. Somali-English dictionary. Language 65.628-632.
30. *Biber, D. and E. Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11.1-34.
29. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1988. Drift in three English genres from the 18th to the 20th centuries: a multidimensional approach. In Corpus linguistics, hard and soft, ed. by Merja Kyto, Ossi Ihalainen, and Matti Rissanen, pp. 83-101. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
28. *Biber, D. 1987. A textual comparison of British and American writing. American Speech 62.99-119.
27. Biber, D. 1987. Review of: Christopher Butler. Statistics in linguistics; Computers in linguistics. Language 63.455-56.
26. *Biber, D. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62.384‑414.
25. *Biber, D. 1986. On the investigation of spoken/written differences. Studia Linguistica 40.1-38.
24. *Biber, D. 1986. Review article of 'Strategies of discourse comprehension', by Teun A. van Dijk and Walter Kintsch. Language 62.664‑8.
23. Biber, D., and E. Finegan. 1986. An initial typology of English text types. In Jan Aarts and Willem Meijs (eds.), Corpus linguistics II: New studies in the analysis and exploitation of computer corpora, 19‑46. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
22. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1986. Toward a unified model of sociolinguistic prestige. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and diachrony, 391‑398. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1986. Uncovering dimensions of linguistic variation in English: A research report. ICAME News 10.49‑52.
20. Finegan, E., and D. Biber. 1986. Two dimensions of linguistic complexity in English. In Jeff Connor‑Linton, et al. (eds.), Social and cognitive perspectives on language (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11), 1‑24. Department of Linguistics, U.S.C.
19. *Biber, D. 1985. Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi‑feature/multi‑dimensional analyses. Linguistics 23.337‑60. (Special issue on Computational Tools for doing Linguistics, ed. by G. Gazdar).
18. Biber, D. 1985. Review of: F. Mino‑Garces. Early reading acquisition: six psycholinguistic case studies. Language 61.81.
17. Biber, D. 1985. Review of: A.S. Palmer, P.J.M. Groot, and G.A. Trosper. The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Language 61.123.
16. Biber, D. 1985. Review of: Michael Hoey. On the surface of discourse. Language 61.734-5.
15. Biber, D. 1984. A model of textual relations within the written and spoken modes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.
14. *Biber, D. 1984. Pragmatic roles in Central Somali narrative discourse. Studies in African Linguistics 15.1‑26.
13. *Biber, D. 1984. The diachronic development of preverbal case markers in Somali. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 6.47‑61.
12. Biber, D. 1984. Review of: E.S. Glenn, with C.G. Glenn. Man and mankind: Conflict and communication between cultures. Language 60.471‑472.
11. Biber, D. 1984. Review of: B. Heine. The Waata dialect of Oromo: Grammatical sketch and vocabulary.; B. Heine. Boni dialects. Language 60.992-993.
10. Biber, D. 1984. Review of: J. Saeed. Central Somali--A grammatical outline. Language 60.993.
9. *Biber, D. 1983. Differential competence in Somali: evidence from the acquisition of noun definitisation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13.275‑295.
8. Biber, D. 1983. Discourse evidence relating to follow‑up reading materials. Notes on Literacy. Pp. 2‑7.
7. Biber, D. 1983. Review of: M.M. Wendell. Bookstrap literature: Preliterate societies do it themselves. Quarterly Report of the Council on National Literatures, 12‑13. Reprinted in Notes on Literacy. 1984. Pp. 24‑26.
6. *Biber, D. 1982. Accent in the Central Somali nominal system. Studies in African Linguistics 13.1‑10.
5. Biber, D. 1982. Review of: C. Ehret. The historical reconstruction of southern Cushitic phonology and vocabulary. Language 58.949‑950.
4. *Biber, D. 1981. The lexical representation of contour tones. International Journal of American Linguistics 47.271‑282.
3. *Biber, D. 1981. More on extrinsically ordered rules: the case of Copainala Zoque. Linguistics 19.1013‑1018.
2. Biber, D. 1981. Proto‑Mixtec. Research Papers of the Texas SIL at Dallas. Pp. 2‑30.
1. Biber, D. 1978. Evidence for rule‑reordering from the Otomanguean languages. Research Papers of the Texas SIL at Dallas. Pp. 70‑82.