![]()
Stream Discharge
Fetter 3.6
| Method for computing stream discharge. | |||
|
|||


Velocity distribution in a stream channel
|
|||||||

Definition sketch of midsection method of computing cross-section area for discharge
measurements.

| Develop a stage discharge relationship for a gaging station. | |||||
|
|||||
Sample worksheet for calculating stream discharge
| VELOCITY | |||||||||
Dist. from initial point |
Width |
Depth |
Observ-ation depth |
Revolut-ions |
Time in sec-onds |
At point |
Mean in vertical |
Area |
Dis-charge |
| 6 | 1.5 | 0 | |||||||
| 9 | 3 | .40 | .6 | 10 | 40 | .565 | 1.20 | .68 | |
| 12 | 3 | .48 | .6 | 15 | 50 | .674 | 1.44 | .97 | |
| 15 | 3 | .72 | .6 | 7 | 42 | .383 | 2.16 | .83 | |
| 18 | 3 | .78 | .6 | 7 | 40 | .401 | 2.34 | .94 | |
| 21 | 2.5 | .86 | .6 | 15 | 40 | .837 | 2.15 | 1.80 | |
| 23 | 2 | .96 | .6 | 25 | 50 | 1.11 | 1.92 | 2.13 | |
| 25 | 2 | 1.00 | .6 | 20 | 41 | 1.08 | 2.00 | 2.16 | |
| 27 | 1.75 | 1.08 | .6 | 20 | 43 | 1.03 | 1.89 | 1.95 | |
| 28.5 | 1.5 | 1.18 | .6 | 15 | 46 | .731 | 1.77 | 1.29 | |
| 30 | 1.5 | 1.24 | .6 | 30 | 45 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 2.73 | |
| 31.5 | 1.5 | 1.34 | .6 | 20 | 52 | .858 | 2.01 | 1.72 | |
| 33 | 1.5 | 1.48 | .6 | 25 | 45 | 1.23 | 2.22 | 2.73 | |
| 34.5 | 1.5 | 1.58 | .6 | 25 | 45 | 1.23 | 2.37 | 2.92 | |
| 36 | 1.5 | 1.50 | .6 | 25 | 42 | 1.32 | 2.25 | 2.97 | |
| 37.5 | 1.5 | 1.48 | .6 | 25 | 40 | 1.38 | 2.22 | 3.06 | |
| 39 | 1.5 | 1.50 | .6 | 25 | 43 | 1.29 | 2.25 | 2.90 | |
| 40.5 | 1.5 | 1.60 | .6 | 20 | 50 | .892 | 2.40 | 2.14 | |
| 42 | 1.5 | 1.24 | .6 | 25 | 41 | 1.35 | 1.86 | 2.51 | |
| 43.5 | 1.5 | 1.30 | .6 | 20 | 53 | .843 | 1.95 | 1.64 | |
| 45 | 1.5 | 1.20 | .6 | 20 | 51 | .875 | 1.80 | 1.58 | |
| 46.5 | 1.5 | 1.00 | .6 | 20 | 56 | .799 | 1.50 | 1.20 | |
| 48 | 1.75 | .96 | .6 | 20 | 58 | .772 | 1.68 | 1.30 | |
| 50 | 2.5 | .40 | .6 | 15 | 47 | .716 | 1.00 | .72 | |
| 53 | 1.5 | 0 | |||||||
| --- | --- | ||||||||
| --- | --- | 44.24 | 42.87 | ||||||
| 47 | 47 | ||||||||
Width of Sections:
observation point (station 6) and the second observation point (station 9)
.
preceding observation point (station 6) and the succeeding observation point
(station 12)
. This method is used up to
the final section.
observation point (station 53) and the preceeding observation point (station 50)
.
The sum of widths in column z should be equal to the width of the stream.

Stilling Well used to measure stream stage.

Typical bubble-gage installation for measuring stream stage.

Manometer assembly and gas-purge system used to measure stream stage.

The following is a hypothetical storm hydrograph for a stream.
| Verde River at Clarkdale: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Hydrograph separation methods. (Fetter p.57) | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| 1) Plot daily stream discharge dates vs. time. | |||
| 2) Compute number of days after peak of Hydrograph when Baseflow returns. | |||
| N=A0.2 | empirical | ||
| N = Number of days after peak. | |||
| A = Area of drainage basin contributing baseflow (mi2). | |||

Figure 3.9 Hydrograph separation into overland-flow component and baseflow
component for a stream receiving Horton overland flow.
Verde River discharge near Clarkdale |
1992-1993 |


Verde River baseflow distribution graphs
Distribution of baseflow for the Verde River at
a) Paulden (1965-78)
b) Clarkdale (1966-78)
c) Camp Verde (1935-45 and 1976-79)


Generalized longitudinal hydrogeologic profile of the Upper Santa Cruz River in Arizona.
| Note areas where the Santa Cruz River gains water from and loses water to the Regional aquifer. |