
|
Lecture 22: Competition Models Reading: Economy of Nature, pp. 483-485. Reminder: Examination II (on lectures 12-22)
Fluctuating environments may permit species coexistence where we would otherwise predict competitive exclusion. This appears to be the explanation for the "paradox of the plankton" (Hutchinson, 1961). Among planktonic species in both freshwater and maine environments, many species coexist in a simple environment without apparent niche differentiation. However, environmental conditions are constantly changing, diurnally and seasonally. Ephemeral habitats represent another kind of fluctuating environment. Brown (1982) studied two species of freshwater snails, Physa gyrina and Lymneae elodes in ponds in northeast Indiana. Removal experiments showed that fecundity of Physa gyrina was reduced by the presence of Lymneae elodes, but competitive inhibition was not reciprocal. Physa gyrina reproduces at a smaller body size and more rapidly than does Lymneae elodes. When ponds dry-up in early July, Physa gyrina may be the only species to have produced desiccation resistant eggs in time. Consequently, Physa gyrina is the only surviving species in ponds that dry-up early, and Physa gyrina persists despite its competitive disadvantage if ponds do not dry-up.
Character Displacement
Experiment attempting to induce character displacement (Schluter, 1994):
The growth and survival depression were greatest among individuals of the benthic variety that had morphologies most similar to the limnetic variety. Among colonies of the seed eating harvester ant, Veromessor pergandi in desert environments of the southwestern United States, Davidson (1978) found that variation in mandible length decreases with increased diversity of competing ant species. Mandible size frequency distributions vary depending on the mandible size of the competing species (after Begon, Harper and Townsend, 1996, p 296, Fig. 7.18).
Competitive Release When all three of these species are found in sympatry, they are found in different habitats, but on other islands where one or two species are absent, habitat utilization expands because competition is reduced or absent.
Lack (1947) reported similar changes in beak size (and food specialization) among species of Darwins finches (Geospiza) on the Galapagos Islands when closely related species were absent (Ricklefs, 1996, p 484, Fig. 21.10).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||