Lecture 35: Biodiversity and Biogeography

expedln.gif (193 bytes)

Reading:  Economy of Nature, pp. 546-571.

expedln.gif (193 bytes)

Biological Diversity

Worldwide Biodiversity

Five Kingdoms (see Ricklefs, 1996, p 596, Fig. 26.1)

Animalia: Insects dominant

Problems with tabulations
Species definition problem

Prokaryotes

  • Eubacteria
  • Archaea (r-RNA gene analysis)

Protozoa (Protista)
Fungi

 

Importance of Diversity

Experimental Evidence

  • productivity
  • stability

Natural Products

  • secondary compounds

Ecosystem Services

  • air quality
  • water quality
  • sustainability (resource recycling)

Human Values

 

Patterns in Species Richness

Number of species decreases with latitude, tropical communities support more species than do temperate of polar communities. This applies to all habitats, terrestrial, aquatic, and marine for a wide variety of organisms.

Some examples of species richness gradients are given below for tunicates (marine invertebrate chordates), marine bivalves, birds, ants, mammals, and trees.

Species richness patterns among marine bivalve mollusks (Ricklefs, 1996, p 548, Fig. 24.1).

Species richness gradients are observed among ant species (Ricklefs, 1996, p 548 Fig. 24.1).

Species richness patterns among breeding birds in the northern hemisphere are given below:

Region
Breeding Bird Species
Greenland
56
New York State
105
Guatemala
469
Columbia
1395

Mammal species (species/150 square miles) in North America (Ricklefs, 1996, p 550, Fig. 24.4).

Tree Families, Genera and Species (Ricklefs, 1996, p 569, Fig. 24.20).

Cause for species richness gradients is not clear, but these gradients follow latitudinal gradients in primary production (after Begon, Harper, and Townsend, 1990, p 653, Fig. 18.2).

 

Consumer species richness follows that of primary producers as seen in bird species (Ricklefs, 1996, p 549, Table 24.1).

Plant productivity and the average number of species of birds in representative temperate zone habitats

HABITAT APPROXIMATE PRODUCTIVITY (gm-2yr-1) AVERAGE NUMBER OF BIRD SPECIES
Marsh 2,000 6
Grassland 500 6
Shrubland 600 14
Desert 70 14
Coniferous Forest 800 17
Upland deciduous forest 1,000 21
Floodplain decisuous forest 2,000 24
Source: E.J. Tramer, Ecology 50:927-929 (1969); productivity data from R.H. Whittaker, Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd. edition, Macmillan, New York (1975)

Hypotheses on causes for species richness gradients are at different levels of analysis and are not mutually exclusive. The great species richness of the tropics could result from:

1. More resources or more resource diversity

2. More specialization (smaller niches) but similar resource abundances

3. More niche overlap

4. Communities more fully saturated (more niches) (Ricklefs, 1996, p 550, Fig. 24.3)

5. More time with stable conditions

More niches are expected in communities that have a greater diversity of plant foliage heights. The relationship between species diversity and foliage height diversity is clearly shown for bird species (Ricklefs, 1996, p 550, Fig. 24.3)

Community fragmentation and isolation may increase with geological time.

Tropical conditions are the oldest and largest regions on earth. Tropical region surface areas are greater than either temperate or polar (arctic and antarctic) regions.

Tropical rain forests cover 7% of land surface but contain more than 50% of all terrestrial species.

Habitat destruction leads to species extinctions.

 

Tropical Soils

Old, deeply weathered soils (oligotrophic soils) as in the Amazon basin

  • Nutrient retention very poor (Ricklefs, p. 175, Table 8.1)
  • Exposed soils dry, bring iron and aluminum oxides to surface forming laterite (concrete-like layer)
  • Surface runoff increases due to impenetrable laterite
  • Soil erosion increases due to increased surface runoff

Distribution of mineral nutrients in the soil and living biomass of a temperate and a tropical forest ecosystem.

NUTRIENTS (kg ha-1)
FOREST (LOCALITY) BIOMASS (T ha-1)* Potassium Phosphorus Nitrogen
Ash and oak (Belgium) 380      
Living vegetation   624 95 1,260
Soil   767 2,200 14,000
Ratio of soil to biomass   1.2 23.1 11.1
         
Tropical deciduous (Ghana) 333      
Living vegetation   808 124 1,794
Soil   649 13 4,587
Ratio of soil to biomass   0.8 0.1 2.0
*T = metric tons
Source: P. Duvigneaud and S. Denayer-de-Smet, in D.E. Reichle (ed.), Analysis of Tropical Forest Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, New York (1970), pp. 199-225; D.J. Greenland and J.M. Kowal, Plant Soil 12:154:174 (1960); J.D. Ovington, J. Biol. Rev. 40:295-336(1965)

Not all tropical soils are the same.

Eutrophic versus Oligotrophic Soils

  • Young, moderately weathered soils (eutrophic soils)
  • Close to their bedrock mineral sources
  • Better mineral nutrient regeneration compared to older soils

(Ricklefs, p. 176, Table 8.2)

Table 4. Standing crops and fluxes of dry biomass and calcium in a nutrient-rich and a nutrient-poor tropical rain forest

CHARACTERISTIC EUROPHIC* OLIGOTROPHIC*
Soil    
Exchangable Calcium** (kg ha-1) 1,900 306
     
Standing crop    
Living vegetation (T ha-1) 263 298
     
Production    
Living vegetation (kg ha-1) 1,033 1,012
     
Calcium in standing crop    
Living vegetation (kg ha-1) 760 529
     
Calcium flux    
Precipitation (kg ha-1 yr-1) 21.8 16.0
Subsurface runoff (kg ha-1 yr-1) 43.1 13.2
Net change (kg ha-1 yr-1) -21.3 +2.8
     
*Eutropic: montane tropical rain forest, Puerto Rico; oligotrophic: Amazonian rain forest, Venezuela.
 
**Soil calcium measured to a depth of 40 cm.
 
Source: C. F. Jordan and R. Herrera, Am. Nat. 117:167-180(1981)

Soil carbon content (humus) critical for nutrient and water retention

Temperate and oligotrophic tropical soils differ in humus content prior to disturbance and lose humus at different rates following cultivation. Tropical soils are generally at much greater risk as a consequence of temperate zone type cultivation.

Undisturbed Soils Carbon Content

Region

Carbon Content (kg/m2)

Canadian Praire

8.8

Brazilian Semiarid Thorn Forest

3.4

Venezuelan Rain Forest

5.1

Soils Carbon Loss After Cultivation

Region

Carbon Loss Rate (%/yr)

Canadian Praire

1%

Brazilian Semiarid Thorn Forest

9%

Venezuelan Rain Forest

11%

expedln.gif (193 bytes)

Copyright 1999 Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED