CENE 437
Single-story Buildings
Construction Details
Building Behavior
Design Rules




HelpStartSyllabusThe ClassLibraryCommunicate
 CENE 437: The Class: Introduction: Design Rules


Introduction

"Rules" you must design by:

Building Codes | Design Standards | Local Entities | Design Philosophy


  1. Building codes:
    • Developed throughout the world for the design and control of material quality.
    • Adopted by cities and counties to become the legal authority.
    1. 3 model codes Þ provide the framework of local codes.
      • Uniform Building Code: Western U.S. - Specializing in seismic.
        (ICBO - International Conference of Building Officials).
      • The BOCA National Building Code: Northern U.S. - Specializing in snow
        (Building Official and Code Administration).
      • Standard Building Code: Southern U.S. - Specializing in wind.
        (SBCCI - Southern Building Code Congress International)
    2. UBC will be taken as the authoritative guide in this class because:
      • We are in the western U.S.
      • It is the most widely used.
      • It reflects the most current seismic/wood/masonry requirements.
      • In the Fall of 1998, we focused on the 1994 version of the UBC.
        • This version has been reorganized and is arranged differently from earlier codes.
      • We are now, Fall of 1999, updating this web site to reflect the 1997 version of the UBC.
        • The seismic section of thes 1997 version has changed considerably.
    3. Future direction for U.S. code:
      • International code.
        • 1 U.S. code called the International Building Code, IBC.
        • ICBO, BOCA, SBCCI have formed a single entity, the International Code Council, ICC.
        • May be in place by Spring of 2000.

  2. Design Standards.
    • Represent the latest structural recommendations.
    • Usually produced by one or more industry associations.
    • Often referenced heavily by the building codes.
    1. For wood:
      • 1997 National Design Specifications for Wood Construction (NDS) published by the Americal Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA) and the American Wood Council (AWC).
        • Design specifications for solid sawn lumber and glued laminated timber.
        • Design values for various species groupings and grades.
        • Address: 1111 19th Street N.W., Suite 800
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          (202) 463 - 2700
        • Although we will be referencing the '97 NDS in this class, note that the '97 UBC relies on an earlier version the 1991 NDS.
      • Timber construction manual by American Institute of Timber Construction (AITC).
    2. For masonry:
      • 1992 ACI 530-92/ASCE-92/TMS402-92 Building Code Requirements for masonry structures.
      • The 1999 version is now available and it includes a number of new provisions:
        • It is reformated.
        • Includes prestressed masonry, inspection and quality assurance, hot weather masonry, and adhered veneer products.
      • Often called the 530 code or the MSJC code.
      • Where MSJC = Masonry Standards Joint Committee with members from:
        • ACI - American Concrete Institute.
        • ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers
        • TMS - The Masonry Society
        • CMR - Council for Masonry Research.
      • Developed a single standard that was mechanics-based for both clay and concrete masonry.

  3. How local entities use model codes and design standards.
    (the following figure was adapted and modified from Masonry Today, Portland Cement Association, Vol. 7, No. 1, Summer 1997.)


    • For the case of Masonry, the BOCA and SBC codes adopts the MSJC code which in turn adopts the MSJC Specifications with references to the ASTM standards.
    • The UBC does not reference the MSJC. It contains its own masonry design provisions and publishes its own materials, testing, and installation standards.
    • It appears that the masonry provisions in the IBC will be a blend of requirements taken from the three codes.
      • Because the ASTM standards and the MSJC are consensus documents, however, the ICC will most likely heavily reference these in the development of the IBC criteria.

  4. Design Philosophy
    • In this class we will use the older Working Stress Design (WSD) approach that is also known as Allowable Stress Design (ASD).
    • This approach is still the most appropriate for wood and masonry, even though both industry groups have made attempts to develop strength procedures.
    • This author believes, however, that these strength efforts are still at the development stage and will not be readily used by the design community for some time yet.
    • The basic WSD approach is:
      • Straight - line, elastic stress assumption (the induced-stresses are within the linear, elastic range of the material's behavior)
      • Actual stress £ Allowable stress
        ß ß
        Stress developed in a structural member due to actual (service or working) loads. A function of the material's strength and behavior for that particular stress under consideration.
      • Example: consider the following simple beam to demonstrate the WSD procedure:



        • This beam experiences shear and bending stresses and could fail in either mode.



        • The basic strength approach (which is also referred to as the load resistance factor design or LRFD) is:
          • Instead of focusing on the yield stress as a design target, strength design uses the ultimate strength as its target. Design equations are based upon forces and moments vs. stresses.
          • Factored loads £ design strength.
          • Example: consider the previous beam, checking it for bending. The basic strength equation could look something like:



  5. Units
    • U.S. Customary
    • Both materials are slow to adopt SI units because of modular construction where wall systems are based upon 16" lengths and roofs are based upon 4' X 8' rectangles.
    • Although many projects have employed a "soft" conversion (designing in US, but converting numbers to SI), its the "hard" conversion that is difficult to employ.
      • Hard conversion will require re-tooling of manufacturing and construction processes to be compatible with SI modulation.
   



Send Email to Deb Larson at Debra.Larson@nau.edu


Web site created by the NAU OTLE Faculty Studio
NAUCopyright 1998 Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED