CENE 437
Introduction
Modeling Forces
Base Shear Terms
Distribution
Example 1
Wall Forces
Example 2

HelpStartSyllabusThe ClassLibraryCommunicate
 CENE 437: The Class: Loads: Lateral Loads: Seismic Loads: UBC '97: Wall Forces


1997 UBC Earthquake Design

Wall Forces


  1. Shear walls (in-plane lateral forces):
    • The shear walls support the diaphragm by receiving the diaphragm reaction, R, through proper connections at the diaphragm boundary.
      • See lateral load path for a review of the basic building's behavior.
      • If you have a masonry or concrete building supported by a flexible diaphragm, the shear wall load (e.g. the diaphragm reaction) could be recalculated to reflect the lower design requirement.
        • This comes from the R = 4.5 for vertical LFRS elements vs. R = 4.0 for the horizontal LFRS.
    • In addition, the wall itself develops inertial forces that also act parallel to the wall and must be accounted for.
      • This additional seismic force is assumed to be generated from the weight of the top half of the wall
    • The shear wall is then usually evaluated for shear stress capacity at mid-height.



      • According to '97 UBC 2107.1.7 if in seismic zones 3 or 4, the shear wall must be designed to resist 1.5 times v.

  2. Out-of-plane bending of walls (lateral forces perpendicular to wall):
    • Refer to '97 UBC 1632 - Lateral forces on elements of structures.
      • Applied forces on elements, (vs. the LFRS), may be larger in magnitude because these elements respond dynamically to the motion of the structure instead of the ground.
    • The strength-level design equation for elements and components has changed considerably from earlier (pre-1997) versions of the code. It now is:



      Where:
      • the subscript "p" refers to elements or components (e.g. parts) of the structure.
      • ap = in-structure component amplification factor found in '97 UBC Table 16-O
        • £ ap £ 2.5
      • Ca = seismic response spectrum value found in '97 UBC Table 16-Q.
      • Rp = component response modification factor form '97 UBC Table 16-O
      • hx = the location (elevation) of the attachment point of the part taken with respect to grade
      • hr = the structure's roof elevation with respect to grade
      • wp = the weight of the element or component under consideration

      • Fp is at strength-level and must be adjusted by 1.4 to reduce it to ASD level.
      • r = 1.0 for elements and components.

    • A common calculation that makes use of this element's provision is to determine the seismic force normal to a wall as shown in the following figure. A sample calcualtion is given in Example 2.
      • Please note that there appears to be a height mistake and a code interpretation problem in Breyer's Example 2.17



  3. Diaphragm anchorage:
    • Lateral forces acting perpendicular to the wall will tend to separate the wall from the horizontal diaphragm.
      • Must provide a positive anchorage system connecting masonry walls to diaphragms, shown above as the "specially designed anchor".
    • This anchorage must resist:
      • Wind forces on wall element.
      • Seismic force normal to the wall using UBC '97 Eqn 32-2. According to '97 UBC 1633.2.81:
        • In seismic zones 3 and 4 with a flexible diaphragm, Rp = 3.0 and ap = 1.5. This ap factor essentially increases the design forces at the wall to diaphragm by 50%.
        • In seismic zone 4, the Fp for wall anchorage ³ 420 lb/ft.
      • Regardless of governing lateral force (wind vs. seismic) the code specifies a minimum, strength-level, anchorage force of 280 lb/ft for concrete and masonry walls ('97 UBC 1605.2.3 and 1611.4)
    • Requirements about anchorage detailing for concrete or masonry walls:
      • In seismic zones 3 and 4 ('97 UBC 1605.2.3)
        • Use embedded straps that attach or hook around reinforcing steel or ensure effective transfer of forces to steel.
        • Limit anchor spacing to £ 4' unless wass are designed to resist bending between anchors.
      • In seismic zones 2, 3, and 4('97 UBC 1633.2.9.5)
        • Anchorage shall not use nails in withdrawal or toe nails.
        • Ledgers or framing shall not be used in cross-grain bending/tension, which is shown in the following figure.



        • To avoid these problems, use specially designed seismic ties that are known as purlin anchors by Simpson Strong-Tie, a manufacturer of prefabricated, light-gauge, steel connectors for wood construction.



Send Email to Deb Larson at Debra.Larson@nau.edu


Web site created by the NAU OTLE Faculty Studio
NAUCopyright 1998 Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED