CENE 437
Bending
Shear
Deflection
Bearing
Examples



HelpStartSyllabusThe ClassLibraryCommunicate
 CENE 437: The Class: Woodbeams: Design: Bending


Design

Bending

General Discussion | Analysis Example


  • In general, bending induces compression and tension axial stresses through resolution of the internal bending moments into a force couple as shown in the figure given below.
    • These axial stresses act normal to the beam cross-section.
    • In ordinary wood beams, these axial stresses are acting parallel to the grain of the member.
    • The distribution of axial stresses is linear with maximum stresses at the extreme fibers (outer edges of beam) and zero stress at the beam's neutral axis.
    • For simply supported members with normal downward external loads, the beam experiences a positive internal bending moment condition; resulting in compression in the top fibers above the neutral axis and tension in the bottom fibers below the neutral axis.
    • The more common loading condition is to stress the beam about its strong axis, (also known here as the x-axis), taking advantage of the larger moment of inertia that works to reduce bending stresses. This is the condition shown in the following figure.


  • In beam design, one important criterion is to examine the beam's critical bending stress conditions.
    • This is done by ensuring that the actual critical stress, (e.g. fb), developed as a function of loading, support conditions, span, and cross-section is £ the factored allowable stress, (e.g. Fb').
    • The following equation has been specialized for examining the maximum stress situation (at the extreme fibers) for rectangular-shaped members.


  • Since much of the bending problem, except for the adjustment factors, is a review from strength of materials, we will jump right into a bending example problem.
    • For this and the following topics, the provided example problem is an analytical one, and not a design problem.
    • This is done to build your confidence with the basic stress techniques prior to the selecting and optimizing tasks that are done in design.
    • The design aspects will be covered under the Design Example topic area of this Design module.


    Back to Top





Analysis Example: Determine if the given beam is adequate in bending.



The general solution procedure is to test if the following is true:

fb £ Fb'

  1. The steps for getting the actual stress, fb, include:
    1. Loading diagram.
    2. Determine the critical bending moment.
    3. Calculate the actual beam stress.

    1. The loading diagram:
      Incorporate
      beam self weight of approximately 6.2 plf.



      For ease of analysis, this beam could be thought of as two separate beams:



    2. Critical bending moment:
      Through the superposition* of maximum bending moments from a single point load case and a uniformly distributed load, the critical moment at mid-span is:



      * Superposition is valid when the maximum moments for the two different load cases are located at the same place along the beam span, as is true here.

    3. Actual bending stress:



      Where Sx is the section modulus with respect to the strong axis and equals:



      Therefore, the maximum actual bending stress is:


  2. The allowable bending stress, Fb':
    • The allowable bending stress is obtained by adjusting the tabulated base design values by the appropriate adjustment factors as shown below:

      Fb' = Fb CD CM Ct CL CF Cr Cfu
        CD: Load duration factor
        CM: Wet service facore
        Ct: Temperature factor
        CL: Beam stability factor
        CF: Size factor
        Cr: Repetitive member factor
        Cfu: Flat-use factor

    • Fb and adjustment factors, except CL
      • Fb = 1000 psi.
          1997 NDS Table 4A for a No. 1 DF-L member.
      • CD = 1.25
          The governing load combination consists of dead and roof live loads.
      • CM = 1.0
          In-service moisture content less than 19%
      • Ct = 1.0
          In-service temperature is within ordinary ranges (less than 100 degrees F)
      • CF = 1.3
          1997 NDS Table 4A.
      • Cr = 1.0
          Members spaces more than 24" o.c.
      • Cfu = 1.0
          Member loaded in edge-wise bending.

    • Bending Stability Factor, CL.
      • The beam stability factor equations follow the same general form of the column buckling expressions known as the Ylinen column equations.





        since point load condition dominates:



        The adjusted allowable stress becomes:
        Fb' = 1000 (1.25)(1.3)(.59)=959 psi

  3. Compare actual stress to allowable stress to determine if beam is adequate in bending:

    fb = 1987 psi
    Fb'= 959 psi
    • Since fb > Fb', this beam is not adequate in bending.
    • What could you do to change this design to make this beam work?



Send Email to Deb Larson at Debra.Larson@nau.edu


Web site created by the NAU OTLE Faculty Studio
NAUCopyright 1998 Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED