|
EDL725 : The Class : Coaching : Conference : Conference |
||||||
Lots of Images! This page will take awhile to load.
One of the most important goals of the coaching process is to develop in the
teacher the lifelong professional desire to continually expand and refine teaching
competencies. This can be accomplished by providing useful feedback in both
direct and indirect styles to teachers to help them analyze, interpret, and
modify their instruction.
In addition to time, effort, and planning mentors must also take into consideration
the needs and values of the teacher as a person. This includes the need for
a quiet and private location where the teacher and the mentor may interact without
interruption. Also, confidentiality is a must. Nothing jeopardizes a trusting
relationship more than being victimized by lounge gossip or hurtful comments.
Time, at least thirty minutes, should be set aside for each conference to discuss
lesson plans and performance. The focus of the conference is on giving and receiving
specific feedback for professional growth. Mentors identify one area of strength
to reinforce and follow with one area of growth to refine/improve. Choosing
only one area to refine narrows the focus for improvement, lowers anxiety, and
creates opportunity for a guaranteed win. Use these criteria for determining
the area of refinement:
1. What will make a significant difference to student learning?
2. Is this a skill that will be used frequently and/or immediately?
3. Will the teacher be able to use this skill successfully tomorrow?
The style and format of the post conference depends on the developmental stage
of the teacher as indicated by the typical behaviors and demonstrated competency
level. Veteran teachers, for example, need a less directive style of conference
that beginning teachers need.
Mentors use a directive conference style when the typical teacher behaviors
include the these characteristics:

Mentors use a collaborative style when the typical teacher behaviors include
the following:

Mentors use the facilitative conference style when the typical teacher behaviors
include these:

Just as we respond to our students according to their respective ability levels,
we must be prepared to do the same regarding the teacher's developmental stages.
It has been noted that teachers progress through three distinct developmental
phases: self-focused stage, content-focused stage, and teaching impact stage.
The coaching behaviors of the mentor who does more of the talking in a directive
conference includes the following elements:
The three basic components of the directive conferences are:

The post conference provides the mentor an opportunity to present a mini-lesson
on the target skill(s). In doing so, it helps the teacher to strengthen new
vocabulary and to connect the cause and effect relationship of the target skills.
For example, it is important to begin the lesson with a strongest because it
captures student attention and engages their minds through active participation.
In the collaborative conference, the mentor guides the teacher's reflections
with questions and prompts the teacher to expand both knowledge and understanding.
Talk time is approximately equal for the mentor and the teacher.

In the facilitative conference the teacher takes the lead and does most of the
talking. The mentor enhances and challenges the teacher to continuously broaden
analysis and solutions. This style is typical of a conference with a veteran
teacher who models excellent teaching skills, attitudes, and competencies with
students, colleagues, parents, and others.
Successful coaching includes the following elements:


Like teachers, mentors grow developmentally, too. It is definitely worthwhile
for mentors to reflect on each conference to determine whether or not it brought
about the desired progress. There are a number of variables that may impact
a conference and therefore a teacher's ability to understand and implement new
teaching strategies.
Coaching expertise is developed through practice, reflection, and communication.
Communication is at the heart of the mentoring process. It always includes nonverbal,
verbal and written communication. Aiding teachers in strengthening connections
is a mentor's responsibility. Brain research also supports the importance of
exposure and experience in growing and grooving the neuro connectors in our
brains to other areas.
Nonverbal cues always accompany verbal interactions and are therefore promoting/reinforcing
ideas given or negating/undermining any verbal ideas given. A smile, nods of
approval, and "thumbs-up" signal, especially during those first lessons,
build a teacher's confidence. On the other hand, head shaking, frown, and "thumbs-down"
signal can be devastating in those initial attempts to teach and may actually
release a brain chemical that freezes actions and thinking.


A range of oral responses is possible and mentors should make a conscious effort
to keep them positive, descriptive, helpful, solution oriented, and construction.
Tact and sensitivity go a long with a teacher who is striving to become a professional
educator.
We must remember that many conferences take place after a long day of teaching,
interacting, and making decisions. Consequently, written direction is the most
helpful form of communication to a teacher because it is most likely to be explicit,
noting specific steps to be taken, and easy to follow. It provides an easy reference
for review and reflection for the teacher.

Mentors of student teachers may want to link daily notes to the assessment instrument
and state one area to celebrate and one area to refine. Some mentors use daily
exchanges of a journal, e-mail, or fax to accomplish this. Sticky notes are
also effective especially if they have the printed message of encourage on them
such as "One to Glow" and "One to Grow."
Mentors for student teachers are required to complete three progress reports,
at the end of each five-week trimester. Rather than being subjective, mentors
use data collected over time to determine the competency level of the student
teacher. They are also encouraged to add written comments to explain or comment
on the rating. Within the first five weeks, mentors who are just getting to
know their student teachers are often reluctant to say anything negative. However,
it is essential that student teachers know what they need to work on before
the final evaluation. They have a very short time to become competent in all
of the areas required before they take over their own classrooms full of students.
Weekly progress reports are very effective for this.


In addition to rating scales, the narrative portion of the final evaluation
allows the mentor to personalize the evaluation. The handbook entitled Coaching
the Student Teacher is provided to mentors of student teachers. It includes
a helpful prewriting guide to use in writing the narrative. College supervisors
are also excellent resources for assistance in writing narratives.
Good narratives include information about the uniqueness of the school and the
classroom setting, especially with regard to diversity. Special skills, contributions,
and accomplishments of the student teacher also attest to his/her professional
potential. This is the mentor's opportunity to personalize the evaluation. Remember,
you are not comparing this student teacher to yourself or teacher of the year
but to other student teachers. You believe that you are a better teacher now
than when you were a student teacher and your mentor believed in your potential
to develop your mastery. That is what you want to convey --- this student teacher's
potential to continue to develop mastery. Ultimately, be fair, honest, and realistic.
At many colleges and universities, mentors can nominate their student teachers
for the "Outstanding Student Teacher Award." The outstanding student
teacher is one who consistently demonstrates a high degree of competency in
all areas and is considered exceptional. Mentors should ask their college supervisors
for forms and information. Usually, input from the mentor, principal, and student
teacher is required along with to videotape. It is always best to confer with
the college supervisor before nominating a student teacher. Applications are
generally due the twelfth week of the semester.
To complete this Topic successfully, please complete the following activities in the order shown below:
CHAT: Case Studies
QUIZ: Conferences Based on Objective Data
ASSIGNMENT: Coaching
and Conferring Activities
Go on to Lesson Analysis
or
Go back to Coaching and Conferencing
E-mail Dr. Gloria Smith at
gjs8@jan.ucc.nau.edu
or call (480) 854-7673

Copyright 2001
Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED