The following is reprinted from the September/October 2004 issue of
NABE
News (Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 22-23 & 25):
A New Native Teacher Corps Integrating Culture and Language
in Schooling
Anna Figueira, Arizona State University
From a tribal and Native American professional perspective,
the creation of lifelong learning environments and meaningful educational
experiences for both the young and adults of a tribal community requires
a language and cultural context that supports the traditions, knowledge,
and language(s) of the community as the starting place for learning new ideas
and knowledge. There is a firm belief within many tribal communities and
(among) Native educators that this cultural context is absolutely essential
if one is to succeed academically and to build meaningful lives as adults.
(Demmert & Towner, 2003, p. 1)
Within educational systems structured around local knowledge, culture and
language, teachers are viewed as the key link between the community and schools.
The nature of the relationship between American Indian students and their
teachers can be a critical factor in academic performance and is a determinant
of whether students will persist or not. Swisher and Tippeconnic conclude:
"We believe that a good teacher is a good teacher, but when there is a
good
Native teacher, the relationship between Native student and teacher is
enhance" (1999, p. 302)."
Situating education within the context of the
Native student's culture and language works best when the teacher shares
that student's culture. However, this is seldom a reality. In 1993-94, nearly
half of all American Indian and Alaska Native students were enrolled in either
BIA/tribal schools or public schools with high Indian enrollments (HIE) where
they comprised from 57% to 98%of the total student body. Thirty-eight percent
of all the teachers in BIA/tribal schools were American Indian or Alaska
Native with 95% of these teachers reporting they were tribally enrolled.
Only 15% of the teachers in HIE public schools were American Indian or Alaska
Native. All other Native students attended public schools with low Indian
enrollments where they represent on average 6% of the total student body
(Pavel 1999). In low Indian enrollment schools, Native teachers are even
less visible.
The Importance of Language and Culture in Native
Education
The President of Chief Dull Knife College Richard
Littlebear acknowledges that it is often difficult to explain why preserving
and strengthening endangered Native languages and cultures is so important.
He speaks of the power of the language to,
make the speakers of that language...whole in a very real
sense. American Indian languages transmit and strengthen our cultural and
individual identities and any splintering of these abilities to transmit
or to strengthen does irreparable harm to American Indian psyches. (2003,
p. 81)
This perspective, which is prevalent throughout American Indian, Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian communities, has informed the content and context of
many community-based, indigenous educational programs in existence today.
In Maryville, Washington, where the Lushootseed language and culture are
"folded" into every layer of the curriculum, an elder explains, "You have
to know your language before you can know your tradition, your culture. It
is spiritual. It is gifted [given to us]. It is important to learn our language
so we know who we are.... We have nothing if our language has been
taken" (Novick, Fisher & Saifer, 2002, p. 89).
Building a New Native Teacher Corps
While increasing the number of Native teachers
has long been a priority among Native communities and educators, recognition
of this critical need in President Clinton's 1998 Executive Order on American
Indian and Alaska Native Education provided an impetus to fund a new teacher
corps initiative. Over the past four years more than 1000 individuals across
the country have completed or are currently enrolled in Native teacher preparation
programs funded by Office of Indian Education (OIE) professional development
grants. There is hope that these new elementary teachers will become the
vanguard in a movement to indigenize schooling for Native students.
In the fall of 2001, when more than 500 students
were already enrolled in the first generation of the new professional development
programs, a study was launched to follow their progress. It encompassed 27
OIE funded programs plus six programs in Alaska and Hawaii that served Native
students. The Native Educators Research Project, based at the Center for
Indian Education at Arizona State University and funded through the Office
of Educational Research and Improvement and the OIE, sought to understand
the dynamic interplay between the programs and the individual experiences
and attitudes of the persons enrolled in them. The first year of the study
yielded a profile of the new teachers, including their attitudes about the
place of language and culture in the classroom, and identified elements of
the individual programs that prepared the new teachers to effectively situate
their teaching within the cultural context of their students' lives.
The new teachers are predominantly female (81%),
and 51% are below the age of 30. Forty-eight percent of the respondents have
had prior experience as instructional aides. More than half understand their
Native or tribal language but only 45% speak it. Concerning their own Native/Tribal
cultures and traditions, 89% report they are somewhat to very knowledgeable.
Ninety-five percent of the respondents feel Native/tribal language should
be included in the schooling of Native children, and 97% feel Native/tribal
culture should be included. When asked How well prepared are you to teach
your Native/tribal language?, 21% said they feel "somewhat" to
"very well" prepared, 64% feel "not at all" to "somewhat" prepared.
With regard to their
preparation to teach Native/tribal culture, 33% feel they are
"somewhat" to "very well" prepared and 38% feel "not at all" to
"somewhat" prepared.
In 2003 case studies were launched to examine
the experiences of eight new teachers, who favored the inclusion of language
and culture and felt that they were prepared to accomplish this, in their
schools and classrooms. These case studies reveal that efforts to situate
learning within the local context are often thwarted by factors within the
teaching environments. The specific situations underlying this issue range
from community dissonance regarding the place of Native language and culture
in the school, to a lack of pedagogical knowledge, methodology and teaching
materials, to the conflicting demands and pressures of state standards and
federal mandates.
Certain other issues also emerged as prominent.
The most frequently cited were the need for orientation, induction or formal
mentoring at the school sites and the need for strategies to increase parent
involvement and enhance communication with families. They additionally identified
issues around discipline, motivating students, and lack of spare time, problems
that are common to new teachers anywhere (Whitaker, 2001).
As the case studies proceeded, the researchers
moved into the role of mentors to the teachers. Utilizing reflective journaling,
they guided participants in exploring issues of pedagogy and curriculum significant
to their experiences and identifying personal bias as well as dissonance
or congruence they were experiencing in their teaching environment. Participants
reported that this process had great value personally and professionally.
The experiences of the novice teachers as well as the success of the mentoring
exercises carry important implications for the professional development of
Native educators.
Implications for Native Teacher Training
The findings from these case studies suggest
three areas of consideration in planning indigenous teacher preparation programs:
1. If Native teachers are expected to integrate Native
language and culture in their teaching, they must be well informed about
issues surrounding these topics and equipped with the methods and pedagogic
techniques to accomplish this.
The mission statements for each of the 33 Native teacher preparation programs
included in this study stress their intent to prepare teachers to be responsive
to the needs of Native students. Many specifically articulate a focus on
Native language and culture. However, the course content and requirements
often do not reflect this intent. Many of the programs have general diversity
education or multicultural education requirements and purport to integrate
Native or tribal values and perspectives into all course work. However, only
six of the programs located in state universities, nine in tribal colleges
and one in a private institution specifically include course requirements
in the areas of Native language, culture and history. Just twelve of the
programs offer or require courses in Native languages, ESL or bilingual education;
eight of these are in tribal colleges.
It is important to note that two of the programs
stand alone as exemplary with regards to their preparation of teachers to
integrate language and culture. Both programs utilize Native language as
the language of instruction, employ indigenous faculty almost exclusively
and situate learning in the context of local knowledge, values and traditions.
2. Instruction should be "indigenized," allocating
more
time and resources to promoting critical thinking around issues that address
the needs of Native communities and learners, such as parent involvement,
authentic assessment, teaching strategies congruent with Native learning
styles; modeling culturally responsive curriculum and teaching; and providing
Native faculty to mentor and guide their professional development.
If their own learning experiences are
presented in context and via processes that are congruent with Native worldviews,
the new teachers will be inclined to transmit knowledge to their own students
in the same way.
3. Mentoring and support must be extended as a constant
feature throughout the teachers' induction year.
In their study of novice teachers,
Lally and Velera noted: "In all too many cases, the tremendous support
surrounding
the student teacher throughout his or her practicum comes to a screeching
halt as soon as the degree is conferred" (2000, p. 106). It has been
suggested that this could be attributed to "Praxis shock," an unsettling
response that occurs when their university preparation confronts K-12 classroom
realities in their first teaching position (e.g., Kelchtermans & Ballet,
2001). This was experienced to some degree by all eight of the Native case
study teachers. However, mentoring activities supported them in identifying
issues, prioritizing goals, resolving problems and developing a reflective
practice that respond to the unique needs of their Native students.
The new Native teachers are teaching us much
about what is important if they are to influence the movement away from ineffectual
assimilationist systems of education toward indigenous models that will honor
Native languages, culture, traditions, values and knowledge and will improve
academic outcomes for Native students. While many of the components of an
indigenous teacher training model are coming into clear focus, Kathryn Manuelito
reminds us: "From a Native perspective, no event or process is completely
finished; it is always in a state of changing and becoming. So, too, in the
case of Native education, and particularly Native teacher preparation programs”
(2003, p.2).
NOTE: Arizona State
University's
Center for Indian Education
published in December 2006 a 156 page monograph describing the results of
their five year Native Educators Research Project titled The Power of
Native Teachers: Language and Culture in the Classroom. Chapters
include A Changing Political Context, The Native Educators Research
Project, Issues Facing New Native Teachers, Defining the Context and
Understanding Behind Language and Culture in Native Communities,
Re-Envisioning Indigenous Teacher Education, and Exercising Our Power as
Native Teachers. Of special interest is information from case studies of
two new Native
teachers: one taught in an Hawaiian Immersion school and the other in a
Navajo (Diné) Immersion School.
References
Demmert, W. & Towner, J. (2003). A review of the research
literature on the influences of culturally based education on the academic
performance of Native American students. Portland, OR: Northwest
Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved August 17, 2004 at http://www.nwrel.org/indianed/cbe.pdf
Kelchtermans, G. & Ballet, K. (2001). The micropolitics of teacher
induction: A narrative-bibliographical study of teacher socialization.
Teaching
and Teacher Education, 18I, 105-120.
Lally, C. & Velera, K. (2000). Language teacher observation
and reflective diaries: An alternative perspective.
Education,
121, 106-120.
Littlebear, R. (2003). Chief Dull Knife Community College is Strengthening
the Northern Cheyenne Language and Culture. Journal of American
Indian Education, 42(1), 75-84.
Manuelito, K. (2003). Building
a Native teaching force:
Important considerations. ERIC Digest EDO-RC-03-9, Charleston,
WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Novick, R.; Fisher, A. & Saifer, S. (2002). Sharing
the wisdom of practice: Schools that optimize literacy learning for all
students. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Pavel, M. (1999). American Indians and Alaska Natives in higher
education. In K. Swisher & J. Tippeconnic (Eds.), Next steps:
Research and practice to advance Indian education. Charleston,
WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Swisher, K., & Tippeconnic, T. (1999). Research to support improved
practice in Indian education. In K. Swisher & J. Tippeconnic (Eds.),
Next steps: Research and practice to advance Indian education (pp.
295-307). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and
Small Schools.
Whitaker, Susan D. (2001). Supporting beginning special education
teachers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(4), 1-18.
|