|
|
Topic 1: Linear Lou
Lou and the Bubble Gum Brief: Goals
|
We have some serious searching to do! The span of history
for court cases to protect the rights of children is short. In 1906 Eduard
Sequin wrote: The individuality of the children is to be secured for
respect of individuality is the first test of the fitness of a teacher.
We have a long history of seeing children as property, and we are still
at the frontier of understanding how to educate and protect youth - how
to balance the needs of one child with the needs of the class - the needs
of one class with the needs of the school.
We live in a world that is rapidly changing with respect to rights, and
it is especially evident to us as we see the struggles of our schools
against the backdrop of the world community and efforts to secure peace
and the right to life. Some might see a distinction between the ethnic
cleansing in a country across the globe and the rights of a child to a
reasonable education without harrassment. Some might say it is the same
fight - but at different places on the continuum.
Are we enjoining the struggle when we say that all children - not just
all people -- are created equal? Will we work to see that each child who
comes into our classrooms has an opportunity to explore options and receive
respect as an individual? Can we also work to help special needs students
feel a sense of belonging in a community of learners? What do you think?
One of the very first cases cited, Brown vs. Board of Education,
1954, was about segregation. Since then we have explored children's rights-
- right to privacy in belongings placed in a school locker, to stay in
school with peers and near home. We have had cases protecting a child's
right to be safe and feel safe, to have special services when needed,
to have services when the local program is not equipped to provide them.
By 1974, there was enough energy surrounding these issues that a Federal
law was passed, requiring schools to provide Free and Appropriate Public
Education to all children as well as five other key pieces. That law and
set of regulations has been updated and added to a number of times. The
most recent revision came in 1997 and is referred to as Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA '97.
The 1997 revision to the law was a grass roots effort, spearheaded by
parents, to let congress and schools know that the letter of the law was
being upheld in many places, but the spirit of the law was being ignored
with heart breaking frequency. The love for children -- a desire to do
the very best for every single student, was not in evidence in enough
schools and with enough consistency. Instead, the situation had become
"adversarial" -- small gains for students and families, eked
out by long, trying court cases, making their way to the Supreme Court
years after students grew out of and graduated from programs. Despite
going to court, the process was so long and complex they often had to
turn to places outside of public education to get the needed support or
program.
School districts and families were suffering the cost and distress of
working out student and school rights through litigation, through being
enemies rather than finding positive ways to support each other and see
the views of one another.
How does a school and a family get to the place that they are willing
to invest years and years to determine if a student may wear an armband
to school? How much emotion is involved in a parent demanding that a student
not be left in a hall way at the mercy of youngsters who are being abusive
and questioning the rights of a teacher to slip a way for a few minutes
and get a break?
These are the questions - the issues - the most basic human rights and
human needs that are at the core of this module. The goals include reaching
a level of skill, understanding and proficiency in covering the material
so that you are able to:
1. Demonstrate knowledge of the legal
provisions known as IDEA 1997,a United States law that mandates
services for students with special needs, understand the statutes
that apply to your own state or country, and Section 504, the Rehabilitation
Act that is binding in the US. |
2. Analyze legal responsibilities of
schools, parents, and students. |
3. Demonstrate an understanding of the
roles of parents with children who have disabilities. |
4. Recognize and discuss some of the
current issues and trends in special education and the role a teacher
may develop in providing consultation and collaboration to those
who need to understand and care about providing appropriate services
to children. |
Naturally, there are a number of ways to demonstrate acquisition of these
skills. The following list includes ways to attain this knowledge and
evaluations to assess your progress in understanding the principles. Of
course, your life and the work you do as a teacher will be the true evaluation
of these principles.
Level of Competency
P = Prior knowledge from previous course
I = Introductory |
Awareness and initial knowledge |
C = Competency |
You are able to discuss ideas from personal
reference and in enough depth to provide examples during discussion
or write a thorough essay including most major points |
M = Mastery |
Understanding of the subject and ideas is so embedded
that application of concepts and utilization of goals is second nature |
Module Objective
|
Level of Competency
|
Evaluation
|
IDEA 97 and Federal Regulations |
Introductory |
|
State statutes regarding special education |
Introductory |
|
Section 504 |
Introductory |
|
Legal responsibilities of all parties - school, parents,
teachers, student |
Introductory |
|
Honoring and understanding the role of parents |
Introductory |
|
The potential role of regular ed. teachers |
Introductory |
|
The potential role of special ed. teachers |
Introductory |
|
Consultation and collaboration |
Introductory |
|
To complete this Topic successfully, please complete
the following activities in the order shown below:
TEXTBOOK: Read the
material in the Blackhurst text, specifically Chapters 1 & 2, pp. 5-75.
WEB ACTIVITY 1: Search
the Web for Court Cases
WEB ACTIVITY 2: Review
laws that pertain to special education
ASSIGNMENT 1: Review
Arizona statutes
GROUP ASSIGNMENT 1: Discuss
IDEA '97
ASSIGNMENT 2: Depose
the Participants
ASSIGNMENT 3: Reflect
on the Teacher as "Peace Maker"
Once you have completed these activities you should:
Go on to Topic 2: Pensive Pat
or
Go back to Module 2: In Practice
E-mail J'Anne Affeld at Janne.Affeld@nau.edu
Course developed by J'Anne
Affeld
Copyright © 1999
Northern Arizona University
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|