PROJECT
SUMMARY
High-resolution
basin analysis of a large-offset extensional system, Lake Mead domain,
east-central Basin and Range Province
We
propose to conduct a high-resolution basin analysis of the syn-extensional
basins in the Lake Mead area. This study will allow us to determine
the tectonic and paleogeographic development of the
domain at the 100 – 200 ky
time scale. Large-scale
continental extension is a fundamental tectonic process and extensional areas
are prime targets for oil and gas exploration; basins in these settings
provide basic data on paleoclimate, water
supply, mineral resources, and the
evolution of high- and low-angle normal faults. The central Basin
and Range—Colorado Plateau to Sierra Nevada—is a corridor in which low-angle normal
faulting was first recognized, lower crustal flow accompanying extension was
first proposed, the rolling hinge hypothesis was proposed, and along which
large-scale extension was quantified 20 years ago. This region includes
low-angle detachment faults, normal faults, transtensional
fault systems, areas of complex 3-D strain with extensional and contractional structures, and locally voluminous magmatism. Despite decades of research, there remain
fundamental questions on the mechanism and evolution of deformation in the central Basin
and Range. Miocene
sedimentary basin fills in the Lake
Mead
domain (east of Las
Vegas, Nevada) hold critical clues to address some of
these questions and in most areas lack detailed study.
Processes of extension are recorded in both the
lower and upper plate, yet in no
extensional system in the Basin and Range has the upper plate been studied in
detail for many tens of kilometers away from the detachment fault, mainly
because of limits of exposure. The Lake Mead domain is ideal for understanding
extensional processes because (1) the footwall of the South Virgin
Mountains–White Hills detachment fault has been studied in detail; (2) there is
widespread exposure of syn-extensional sedimentary
and volcanic rocks that stretch 50 km in front of the detachment fault and 100
km north of it; (3) there are numerous tuffs; (4) the area is mapped at
1:100,000 scale, and most is mapped at 1:62000 or 1:24000 scale; (5) the basic stratigraphy and structure framework are known; and (6)
there is a mix of clastic and carbonate rocks that, when combined with a detailed chronostratigraphic
framework, will allow us to begin to separate
the influences of tectonics and climate.
This study will focus on three major questions that
are important for extensional tectonics globally and for which we can make
major progress in the Lake Mead domain.
The main hypotheses we are testing are that (i) the Lake Mead domain developed from east to west in
discrete stages from detachment faulting to transtensional
faulting, to tectonic escape accompanied by shortening; (ii) extension,
detachment faulting, and exhumation were initially
driven by overthickened crust, but the temporal
evolution was controlled by far-field plate boundary changes; (iii) changes
in patterns and rates of faulting exert a first-order control on basin geometry
and stratal thickness, but climate controls
significant details of the stratal architecture that
have heretofore been attributed to tectonic processes.
The PI’s and colleagues form a new team that spans
the requisite diverse expertise: basin
analysis, sedimentology, stratigraphy,
structure, paleoclimatology, and geochronology and
petrology of volcanic rocks. The team has worked for 5-6 years in Lake Mead;
our USGS and NAU colleagues have worked for 20 – 40 years in the area. This
collaboration represents professors and students from PhD+MS,
MS-only, and BA-only
departments that will give a broad spectrum of research opportunities to
students in the field and lab. We also
are planning strong synergistic relationships with the Lake Mead National
Recreation Area and the BLM
that will increase the societal impact of this study considerably.