Because of the poor subtitling, I have included a link to a general
description of the film on this page, below, or you may link directly to
http://www.filmindia.com/films/garland/garam.html
to get details about the characters and their relationships. I don't expect
you to repeat this information in your reviews, but nor should you get
it wrong! The questions the film raises are both personal and socio-historical.
There is of course the whole issue of the place of Muslims in post-partition
India, and whether or not they should move to Pakistan. Some middle class
Muslims from this family do, and apparently prosper. Yet others - whether
it's Ammi, the grandmother, her son Salim, or Sikandar the grandson - feel
that their personal, political, and historical ties to India are too strong
to allow them to do so. The film certainly points to the special plight
of a Muslim minority in independent India. At the same time, however, it
is also a critique of the larger political system which produced partition
(note how politicians are depicted in the film) and now runs independent
India (Sikandar's Hindu and Sikh friends are equally unemployed).
REVIEW (and readings)
Your review of the film should try to set this film in its historical
context, namely the politics surrounding India's partition. I have already
given you a lecture on this earlier, and a handout. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~sj6/filmHND04.htm
The relevant chapters of your textbook do a very good job of summarizing
the political and social events which produced this momentous event. I
have asked you to read Mushirul Hasan's "Introduction" because he does
a marvelous job summarizing the existing variety of scholarly writing by
historians analyzing the partition of India. It also provides some more
details of speeches etc., which are not present in the textbook. (Hint:
Think about working on some aspect of the partition for your paper - Hasan
has already done the preliminary research and outlined it for you! Your
thesis still needs to be original of course)
Your review then, should demonstrate a familiarity with two things:
1. The history of partition.
2. How this history has been written about, the main trends, approaches,
etc.
However, as I have already said to you before, I want this review, and
the following one, to use your viewing of these films to suggest if and
if so, how, films can help us re-examine the way we write histories. In
other words, how can we use films to reach beyond the existing writing
of the history of partition. For example, how could a film like Garam
Hawa point us towards what is missing from the existing histories
of India's partition? What sort of ideas could it give historians to usefully
ADD to the histories they write? As I have said before, you can write such
reviews only if you first understand the history, and the way these histories
have been written, which of course, means that you need have done your
readings!!
Best of luck, and my apologies for not being with you when you see Earth. The same general guidelines apply for the review. The film itself is much more recent, and easier to follow because of better subtitling and frequent English dialog. If Garam Hawa was set among Muslims in India after partition, Earth is set what is now across the border, in Pakistan, just before partition. Please feel free to email me with any questions you may have about the film or the readings. The reviews for Garam Hawa are due Nov. 14th. I want the reviews for Earth to be turned in the following Friday, so that we can get back to schedule.