To access this directly go to
http://www.telegraphindia.com/archive/
put in the above date and go to the "editorials" section
Text of Review Follows
BY ARNAB BHATTACHARYA
FRACTURED MODERNITY: MAKING OF A MIDDLE CLASS IN COLONIAL NORTH INDIA
By Sanjay Joshi,
Oxford, Rs 495
The emergence of the middle class is one of the major social phenomena
in colonial India. In India, like elsewhere in the world, the values and
lifestyle of the middle class are determined as much by economic indicators
as by its specific mode of intervention in the public sphere. Middle-class
discourse in colonial India, derivative as it is, incorporates glaring
paradoxes, evident in such public sphere activities as the nationalist
politics or the women's empowerment programme of this period. Ambiguities
in the middle class consciousness prompted its inconsistent attitudes towards
social issues which kept oscillating between the authoritarian and the
liberal, the egalitarian and the parochial, the democratic and the hierarchic
and so on.
Sanjay Joshi's contention in his book, Fractured Modernity, is that
the Indian middle class consciousness is a product of cultural entrepreneurship.
It is shaped by the notion of modernity, received during the British rule
as ruptured and fragmented. Positing his study against the backdrop of
Lucknow, Joshi argues that this "fractured modernity" is not an exclusive
colonial legacy for the Indian middle class (as suggested by most subalternists),
but a characteristic of the post-Industrial Revolution and post-Enlightenment
European middle class as well. But the model of European modernity fails
to explain the efforts of the middle class, both Indian and European, to
reconstitute itself.
Joshi's exploration of the competing ideologies that go into the making
of the middle class in Lucknow is, to his mind, a case-study based on variables
flexible enough to have wider application. He notes that the middle class
in colonial Lucknow, in its bid to assume social leadership, created new
norms of respectability while remaining equidistant from the elite and
the lower classes. Its attempts at self-construction called for a reworking
of traditional values of the nawabi era and tempering them with radically
modern concepts. This resulted in contradictions still evident in the postcolonial
north Indian middle class.
The most interesting chapter of the book is the last, where Joshi records his reflections on the fractured modernity. Here he suggests methods of "provincializing" European modernity, erroneously conceived as universal in the colonial period. He recognizes the divergence between the theoretical and practical aspects of modernity as part of lived reality in both Indian and European contexts.