web4

Site Navigation Introduction Task Process - Speech Process - Reading Process - Visual Conclusion

The Evaluation Rubric

Use this criteria to evaluate yourself and your group.

	Beginning 1	Developing 2	Accomplished 3	Exemplary 4	Score
Define the Problem/	Vague and unfocused understanding of assignment or problem	Some clarity is evident, but some elements of the problem have not been considered	Clear and complete understanding of the assignment/ problem	Additional or unexpected features support understanding of the assignment/ problem
Identify a goal	Makes little effort to identify a goal or identifies goals unrelated to intended outcome	Goal is identified, but does not take all issues of the situation into consideration	Identifies a goal that reflects understanding of the situation and intended outcome	Identifies a goal that reflects deep understandings of the parameters of the situation and intended outcome
Gather information	Ineffective use of resources; unable to analyze information effectively or components of assignment are missing	Some use of resources and some components have been analyzed.	Effective location and use of resources and competent analysis of information	Extensive and effective location and use of resources and extensive analysis of information
Generate solutions	Incomplete or ineffective selection of alternative solutions	Demonstrate minimal account of alternative solutions	Demonstrates an adequate account of alternative solutions	Demonstrates an exhaustive account of alternative solutions
Evaluate the alternatives	Little effort to evaluate effectiveness of alternatives; failure to take other perspectives into account Identified constraints may not be related to the goal or failure to identify constraints	Evaluation makes a surface attempt to address alternatives from some perspectives. Constraints are vaguely identified.	Adequate evaluation of alternatives from most perspectives Identifies constraints related to the goal along with some ways of overcoming them	Insightful and thorough evaluation of alternatives from a variety of perspectives Identifies additional constraints related to the goal along with creative ways of overcoming them
Select best alternative	Unaware of different strategies or chooses a strategy without comparing it to other strategies	Chooses a strategy with minimal support for the choice.	Chooses an appropriate strategy and supports the choice with a research-based rationale for the choice	Chooses an appropriate strategy and supports the choice with an extensive research-based rationale for the choice.
Group Dynamics	No evidence that the team members facilitated a collaborative decision-making process	Team members worked together throughout the process with minimal collaborative decision-making.	Team members attitudes and work ethic promoted collaborative decision-making	Collaborative decision-making permeated every aspect of the team work.
Presentation	The quality of the presentation reflects significant confusion about the situation and fails to solve the problem Presentation is not of a professional quality	The quality of the product reflects some understanding of the situation and suggests a solution to the problem Presentation displays some professional quality	The quality of the product reflects an understanding of the situation and suggests a solution to the problem Presentation is of an adequate professional quality	The quality of the product reflects deep understanding of the situation and suggests a well-supported solution to the problem Presentation exemplifies professionalism
Self Evaluation	Superficial evaluation of the process and/or outcome	Evaluation of the task lacks detail of either the process or outcome.	Thorough evaluation of the task including both the process and the outcome	Evaluation of the task including both the process and the outcome with insight into future applications of the learning.