DH450
 Getting StartedSyllabusClassLibraryCommunicate
  Help

DH450 : The Class : Introduction : Literature Review : On-Line Lesson

On-Line Lesson

Reviewing the Literature/ Identifying Resources

Why is a review of existing literature necessary?

How to get started with a literature search

Computer Data Bases

Use the following link to get to the NAU Cline Library Index Page
Select a topic on the left side of the page

Or go directly to Health Science Indexes (includes Medline OVID, PsycINFO)

Or go directly to Education Indexes (includes ERIC)

Primary and Secondary Sources

Try to find primary sources.
Primary sources are reports by the individuals who actually conducted the research.
They are called "research articles"
Don't rely too heavily on secondary sources.

Secondary sources are summaries by someone other than the researcher.
Someone, who read the primary source, rephrased or summarized it.
It is possible that the reader could introduce bias or misinterpret the original source

Examples of secondary sources include:

Review articles
Textbooks
Encyclopedias

Types of Research Articles

Reports by the individuals who actually conducted the research.

These articles have a "methods" or "materials and methods" section, and a "results" section.

Ex: test new theories and hypotheses, evaluates program interventions, compares various strategies and methods

Someone, other than the researcher himself, reads the research on a given topic, then summarizes and critiques it.

A report of a single case or patient situation (such as one patient who was treated with a new therapy)

Reports of a correlation or relationship between variables (other than cause and effect) or description of results of a survey. Epidemiological research (identifies rates of disease , describes demographics of population, prevalence of disease etc.)

 

Parts of a Research Article

Introduction and literature review

  • Background and justification for research
  • Cites other similar or related studies
  • Methods and materials

  • Describes exactly how the study was conducted
  • Very important section for the new researcher and for the critical reviewer
  • Results

  • Tells about the data, or numbers that resulted from the study.
  • Discussion

  • An important section for the new researcher
  • The researcher tries to explain reasons for the outcome of the study
  • Relates outcome of this study to others
  • Explains problems, suggests ideas for future research
  • A good way to get ideas for research to be conducted
  • Summary and conclusions

  • Too often, the only section read
  • Can be misleading without reading the entire article
  • References

  • Very important in reviewing the literature
  • The author may reference articles that you would like to obtain and read in full
  • Organizing the Material

    The literature review should allow the reader to see what problem you are trying to solve, what information has already been published on this topic (both pro and con), any theoretical framework that will be incorporated, and what you hope to accomplish as a result of the research.

    Use the professional journals in your field as a guide.

    Obtain articles from several journals that publish research articles. Examples: Public Health Reports, Journal of Dental Hygiene, Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Journal of Periodontology. Read the articles carefully to determine what references they included in their introduction and how they organized the review of the literature. Can you determine a flow to the literature review?

    Introduce the topic or problem

    Review past research that is relevant to the problem; a historical, descriptive review

    Point out unanswered problems, weaknesses or shortcomings

    Show how your study will fill in the gap or answer the question raised

    End with the purpose of your study

    How long should the review be? How far back should I go in my search for references?

    Unless there is a classic article that is critical to the topic area try and limit your review to the last five years. The review should be long enough to provide a solid foundation from which to judge the merit of your research project. The goal of your literature review is to demonstrate that your project is relevant, original, helpful and timely.

    How should I organize my references?

    Follow the format used in the journal in which you wish to publish your study. Obtain a copy of that Journal's Authors Guide.

    Or use APA Style

    Help with citations

     

    Beware These Common Errors Made by Students when Reviewing the Literature

    Don't carry out a hurried review in order to get started with the research

    Don't rely too heavily on secondary sources

    Don't concentrate solely on the results; there is valuable information in the methods section

    Don't forget to define your topic/problem limits

    Too broad: there is too much literature to read it all

    Too narrow: Don't forget peripheral articles that could help

    Ex: If studying a chlorhexidine toothpaste and there are not many articles, look at studies comparing other toothpastes to see methods, indices, success criteria etc.


    Once you have finished the lesson you should:

    Go on to Identify Article Type
    or
    Go back to Literature Review

    E-mail Tricia Moore at Tricia.Moore@nau.edu
    or call (520) 523-4012


    NAU

    Copyright © 2000 Northern Arizona University
    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED