Here's how your papers will be read and graded. | ||||||
Full Points | Clearly stated purpose early in the first paragraph (also known as a thesis statement). | A discussion that supports the stated argument. | Specific examples that are cited and relevant to the discussion thereby pushing the argument because of the credibility and data included (quotes or paraphrased information are folded into the writing). | Images that expand the discussion's main point, and that clarify the details as well as providing further thought on the argument. | Organization has an introduction, discussion, and conclusion. | |
-5 Points | Lengthy introduction with a general purpose statement. | A discussion that addresses the stated argument but leaves unanswered questions. | Examples that are cited and good for discussion but they do not push the argument | Images that help the discussion's main point, and that help the details. | Organization has an introduction, discussion, and conclusion. | |
-10 Points | Purpose Statement is hidden. Conceptual but not stated directly. | A discussion that addresses the concept, but leaves more questions than answers producing a paper that is more than 1 document. | Examples are missing citations; examples are understood but not connected to the general argument. | Images are not specifically connected to any one idea but to the general concept of the paper. | Organization has an introduction, discussion, and conclusion. | |
-15 Points | No Purpose Statement. | A discussion that lacks specific nouns, very general, very elusive argument. | Examples are lacking. Too few. | Images are not attached to any part of the discussion. | Organization has an introduction, discussion, and conclusion. |
|
-20 Points | Written while asleep. | A discussion that shows more caffeine than thought. | Examples are embarrased to be associated with the paper. | Images are of snowstorms. | Organization Lobotomy. |