Unit 9
  English 201: 
  Masterpieces of Western Literature
Unit 9 Reading Course Reading Entry Page
Introduction Background . Explication Questions Review
Background:

Gender: Be hesitant in making contemporary American judgments about Aeschylus' assumptions in regard to gender roles.  When he says, e.g.:
13     That woman [Clytaemnestra]--she maneuvers like a man.
Aeschylus is making a point about behavior out of the ordinary. Hubris is the primary example.  Behavior that is out of the ordinary (in this case, what is ordinary in regard to gender roles), is not wrong, but it attracts our attention alerting us to the possibility of danger.

Human Sacrifice: Remember AK's horrific vow to PAT's shade?
(Iliad)18.393    Before your funeral pyre I'll cut the throats
                        of 12 resplendent children of the Trojans
We don't know exactly what such a sacrifice is suppose to accomplish.  AK suggests that it will somehow assuage his rage or perhaps simply express it:
18.395               that is my murdering fury at your death.
Obviously it is revenge against Troy.

What is our reaction to AK's human sacrifice?  We find it repugnant, savage, primitive; & that is the point.  When AG sacrifices innocence/Iphigeneia, there is nothing redeeming in the act:
228    no innocence moves her judges mad for war.
         Her father called his henchmen on

Artemis/Diana (wearing the moon in her hair)
Isn't it interesting (& perhaps necessary) that AG's victim is a girl, not a boy like Abraham's sacrifice?  Changing the sex increases the connotation of innocence & fragility.  It seems to change our focus from the motives of the priest or the one who offers the sacrifice to the victim.  In any case, Aeschylus' play is obviously a statement against the universal practice of human sacrifice.  Why?  Where the Greeks in the habit of offering human sacrifices such as those being done by the thousands at Chichen Itza?  No.  Almost since we began this course we found Homer & now Aeschylus interested in how to put a city together, how to nurture civics & civilization.  The kind of human sacrifice Aeschylus has in mind are the citizens who so often have been considered "cannon fodder" by leaders.
If it isn't the wind that literally blows in the wrong direction, there will be some political or religious wind that needs correction by the sacrifice of young lives.  Aristophanes ridicules almost the same idea (militarism) in Lysistrata.
 

Tragic Drama Formula: Did you read pp. 10-12 that said:

Tragic drama was civic & moral instruction.  The instruction offered negative role models.  The characters could not be so negative as to be unengaging.  How many times has Hitler been dismissed as crazy or opaque -- someone whose motives were unfathomable?  What do we learn from this?  Nothing.  Here is the formula for Greek tragic drama: The moral dilemma must be ambiguous.  If the issue were clear cut & obvious there would be little to say & nothing to engage our analytic interest.  Typically the moral issue can be argued in 2 or more directions.  Whatever the provocation & no matter how many plausible excuses the perpetrator has, the act of hubris (by definition) cannot be defended.  It is wrong.  The lesson is: commit this (or a significantly similar act) & you will inevitably wreck your life, suffering consequences similar to those experienced by the tragic hero.

Click on the next section: Explication above.