|
Beginning
1 |
Developing
2 |
Accomplished
3 |
Exemplary
4 |
Score
|
Define
the Problem/ |
Vague and unfocused understanding of
assignment or problem |
Some clarity is
evident, but some elements of the problem have not been considered
|
Clear and complete understanding of the
assignment/ problem |
Additional or unexpected
features support understanding of the assignment/ problem |
|
Identify
a goal |
Makes little effort to
identify a goal or identifies goals unrelated to intended
outcome |
Goal is identified, but
does not take all issues of the situation into consideration
|
Identifies a goal that reflects
understanding of the situation and intended outcome
|
Identifies a goal that reflects deep
understandings of the parameters of the situation and intended
outcome |
|
Gather
information |
Ineffective use
of resources; unable to analyze information effectively or components of
assignment are missing |
Some use of resources
and some components have been analyzed.
|
Effective location and use of resources
and competent analysis of information
|
Extensive and effective location and use of resources
and extensive analysis of information |
|
Generate
solutions |
Incomplete or
ineffective selection of alternative solutions
|
Demonstrate minimal
account of alternative solutions
|
Demonstrates an
adequate account of alternative solutions
|
Demonstrates an
exhaustive account of alternative solutions |
|
Evaluate the
alternatives |
Little effort to
evaluate effectiveness of alternatives; failure to take other perspectives
into account
Identified constraints
may not be related to the goal or failure to identify constraints
|
Evaluation makes a
surface attempt to address alternatives from some perspectives.
Constraints are
vaguely identified.
|
Adequate evaluation of
alternatives from most perspectives
Identifies constraints related to the goal
along with some ways of overcoming them |
Insightful and thorough evaluation of
alternatives from a variety of perspectives
Identifies additional constraints related to the goal
along with creative ways of overcoming them |
|
Select best alternative |
Unaware of different strategies or chooses
a strategy without comparing it to other strategies
|
Chooses a strategy with minimal support
for the choice.
|
Chooses an appropriate strategy and supports the choice with a
research-based rationale for the choice
|
Chooses an appropriate strategy and supports the choice with an
extensive research-based rationale for the choice.
|
|
Group Dynamics |
No evidence that the team
members facilitated a collaborative decision-making process |
Team members worked together
throughout the process with minimal collaborative decision-making. |
Team members attitudes and
work ethic promoted collaborative decision-making |
Collaborative decision-making
permeated every aspect of the team work. |
|
Presentation |
The quality of the presentation reflects
significant confusion about the situation and fails to solve the
problem
Presentation is not of a
professional quality |
The quality of the product reflects
some understanding of the situation
and suggests a solution to the problem
Presentation displays some
professional quality
|
The
quality of the product reflects an understanding of the situation
and suggests a solution to the problem
Presentation is of an adequate
professional quality |
The
quality of the product reflects deep understanding of the situation
and suggests a well-supported solution to the problem
Presentation exemplifies
professionalism |
|
Self Evaluation
|
Superficial evaluation of the
process and/or outcome |
Evaluation of the task lacks
detail of either the process or outcome. |
Thorough evaluation of the task including
both the process and the outcome |
Evaluation of the task
including both the process and the outcome with insight into future
applications of the learning. |
|