|
|
American Indian Education |
|
| books | conferences | articles | columns | contact | links | index | home | |
This article appeared on pages 19-21 in the April 2006 issue of Indian
Education
Today published by the Native American Journalists Foundation, which
became the Native American Review in August 2006 and
ceased publication in December 2006.
Reading, Writing and Finding SovereigntyJon Reyhner, Northern Arizona UniversitySovereignty is a big issue today that revolves around decolonization and taking back local control of Indian country. While much of the discussion involves federal policies like self-determination and strengthening tribal governments, what does sovereignty mean for the individual tribal member? Taking back control involves taking responsibility for one's life and for one's nation, rather than leaving it to others to make decisions. It can mean paying taxes to support one's tribal government; it means choosing or being competent, visionary leaders; it means being educated. Sovereignty means that one has to deal with other sovereign nations on a government-to-government basis and that involves knowledge about laws, treaties, policies, business, economics, and a vast variety of subjects that cannot be dealt with without a modern education, including competency in reading and writing. However, Indian schooling for most of history has been anti-Indian sovereignty. It was designed to assimilate students into the mainstream society, often to become low paid service industry workers. So it can seem natural to oppose education in the name of sovereignty or to push a "traditional curriculum" that ignores "white" non-Indian things like reading and writing. However, as the novelist Thomas Wolfe says, you can't go home again. Are most Indians, even if they could, willing to give up their pickup trucks and other modern conveniences that are part of our modern technological society? You are not sovereign if every time something breaks down you have to call in a "white" guy to fix it--whether that be an auto mechanic, a lawyer, or a medical doctor. No wonder there is so much unemployment on reservations if much of the work there goes to outsiders. Education does not have to be for assimilation. It can focus on local challenges--whether they be environmental, social, or economic--and they can be dealt with using traditional Indian values and a technical/scientific education that is not the exclusive property of white Euro-Americans. The Chinese, Japanese, and many other peoples around the world are showing us that every day. To study important local challenges is to take control of them and work to improve them. Local issues need to be studied and that includes, but is not limited to, reading up on them and writing about them. So how do you become better readers and writers? The U.S. Department of
Education's
2000 National Report Card on Reading found that fourth graders who
read better watch less television, read more
for
fun, talk more about reading with family and friend, and have more books,
magazines, and newspapers in their homes. The emphasis a
family
and a culture put on reading influences how much effort children put into
reading. Stephen Krashen in his book the Power of Reading notes also how important it is for communities
and
schools to support libraries, especially in low-income communities where
families don't have the money to buy many books.
Teachers need large classroom
libraries with material on a variety of topics and at a variety of grade
levels
to give their students choice about what they will read while schools need
large libraries that often in isolated rural areas also must serve the
whole community
because of the lack of public libraries. Dr.
Sandra
Fox (Oglala Sioux) writes in her introduction to the Creating Sacred
Places
for Children curriculum published by
the
National Indian School Board
Association, "reading to children is the
single most
important activity that parents can provide to help their children succeed
in
school" and recommends that teachers:
Dr. Lori Arviso Alvord, the
first
Navajo woman surgeon and now an Associate Dean at Dartmouth Medical
School,
notes the importance of becoming a good reader in her 1999 autobiography
The
Scalpel and the Silver Bear. She
attended
the public high school at Crownpoint in the Navajo Nation
where, "I
made
good grades...but...received a very marginal education. I had a few good
teachers, but teachers were difficult to recruit to our schools and they
often didn't stay long. Funding was inadequate. I spent many hours in
classrooms where, I now see, very little was being taught." What
saved
her later in college was her "strong reading background." She
writes, "I read my way through the tiny local library and the vans
that
came to our community from the Books on Wheels program." Encouraged
by
her parents "to read and dream," she could even get out of
chores
by reading.
The U.S. government recognizes
that
students who read well tend to do well in school and in life, so its
efforts to
improve academic achievement tend to focus first on reading as the No
Child
Left Behind Act of 2001 does with its "Reading First" provisions. Reading
First
is largely based on the 2000 review of research done by the National
Reading
Panel authorized by Congress in 1997. However, the Panel in their
extensive review
of research did not look at the issue of student motivation and looked
only at
experimental studies, none of which focused on American Indian or Alaska
Native
students. The Panel did not look at any ethnographic studies where
researchers
actually went into classrooms and observed the interactions between
teachers,
Indian students, and textbooks.
The Panel ignored what Sylvia Ashton Warner learned in teaching
Maori
students in New Zealand that:
First words must be already
part
of the dynamic life [of the
child].
First
books
must be made of the stuff of the child himself, whatever and wherever the
child. (Teacher, 1963)
The Panel strongly emphasized
the
importance of phonemic awareness despite the fact that half the words in
the
English language do not follow commonly taught phonetic rules. English has
borrowed many words from other languages, including American Indian
languages,
and pretty much kept the pronunciation from those languages. Warner
recommends
beginning reading instruction with a "key vocabulary" that are sight words
a
child uses in conversation and have deep emotional meaning for this child,
not
the often "dead" vocabulary from the textbook. New words chosen by each
child are put on cards and reviewed daily. As Warner notes, getting to
know
your
students' key words is getting to know your students—their hopes,
fears,
and the challenges they face growing up.
However, if there is one thing
I
have learned from over thirty years working in Indian education, it is the
need
for balance and harmony. Because it can be effective to treat a child's
beginning reading vocabulary as sight words (words to be memorized rather
than
sounded out) does not mean that students don't need to learn the
relationship
between the sounds of a language and its writing system (other than for
idiographic writing systems such as the one used in China). But even for
phonically regular words, local "rez" dialects may well pronounce a word
differently than from the "correct" way given in the
textbook.
For that half the words that
follow
common phonic rules, these rules need to be taught, but using words that
students will know the meaning of once they sound the word out in contrast
to
using whatever "canned" vocabulary list a reading textbook happens to use.
One
can start with something like the beginning sounds of the names of the
students
in a class and play with changing those sounds so every student's name
starts
with the "p" sound on Tuesday (Olin becomes Polin) or one can do an
activity
with students, have them talk about it, and then write down what they
say—there own stories—and use that for the
reading lesson, which is called the language experience approach. The
final
part of any reading lesson needs to go beyond phonic and other activities
and
focus on comprehension because getting meaning from text is what reading
is all
about. As Luther Standing Bear noted in 1928 in his book My People the
Sioux, just pronouncing words is only
parroting—what
parrots do when they "talk."
As the research review I did
for
the Indian Nations at Risk Task Force over a decade ago found, up into
high
school dropouts view school as boring and unrelated to their lives and
they
perceive teachers as uncaring—more interested in the subject they
teach
than the lives of their students. In my 2006 book Education and
Language
Restoration I write about my son
Tsosie's
chemistry teacher, Mansel Nelson, at Tuba City in the Navajo Nation.
Mansel
began to rethink the way he taught soon after arriving in Tuba City after
his
best chemistry student asked him "Why are we learning chemistry?" He began
thinking of ways to make chemistry relevant to the lives of his Navajo
students. He started taking local community issues and challenges and
teaching
chemistry around them--issues of water quality, diabetes, and uranium
mining. Like Warner with her key words, Mansel sought to connect the
"foreign"
content of the mainstream textbook curriculum to actual concerns of his
students and their community. His students talked, read, and wrote about
these
concerns in Navajo and English and by studying these issues prepared
themselves
for sovereignty—taking control over their own lives and the life of
their
community.
Students need to read well to
do
well in advanced mathematics and science classes as well as in language
and
literature classes, and to read well students need more than instruction.
Whether it be basketball or reading, children need to practice, practice,
practice to become really good. Series books like those in Lord of the
Rings
and Harry Potter books can provide students the practice they need to
become
fluent readers. They can also learn how much more is in these books than
is in the movies that are made from them. Besides popular books like
the
Potter series, there are many excellent books by and about American
Indians
that students can read if they are available in school
libraries.1
Too much emphasis on book
reports
and accuracy in reading and writing can discourage and even create
resistance in students as reported by Cleary and Peacock in their book
Collected
Wisdom where they interviewed teachers of Indian
students.
It is critical as Sylvia Ashton Warner notes that students learn that
reading
it not just something one has to do in school; it can be an enjoyable
recreational activity.
Also, to become good writers
students need to do more than fill in blanks in often boring classroom
worksheets. They need to write a lot, and their writing will help them
learn to
reason better and process information about things that are important to
their
lives and their communities.
Besides the importance of
using
relevant curricular materials and learner-centered instructional
practices,
psychologists note the importance of choice in motivating students.
Effective
schools researcher Dr. Larry Lezotte declares, "we tell kids from a very
young
age that you are responsible for your own learning, but we don't give
them much
authority over the learning." He emphasizes that, "Choice is a powerful
variable in the learning game" and that "virtually all learning is an act
of
choice on the part of the learner." He quotes author Peter Block to the
effect
that, "If you can't say no, yes doesn't mean anything." While students
need to learn the knowledge and skills codified in state standards, they
also need to
have some choice in what they read and what type of learning projects they
work
on. Sovereignty is a nation making their own choices about their future,
and
education should be the process of preparing citizens to help make those
choices
intelligently. Dick Littlebear, now president of Chief Dull Knife College,
has
summed up the importance of Indian education for
sovereignty:
It is difficult for our Native
American
languages and cultures to survive and it will get more difficult. One of
the
reasons for this increasing difficulty for Native language groups is that
we
are in the midst of a cultural transition which has demeaned our languages
and
cultures. However, remember that our cultures have proven their ability to
survive and adapt over the past thousands of years when they have
undergone
other cultural transitions.,,, [W]e must devise our own strategies to
counter
the negative effects of cultural transition. Especially since this
cultural
transition is being complicated by alien organizational systems, by high
technology, by alcohol, by drugs, by ambiguous values, by exploding
populations, by erosion of language and culture, and by a shrinking world
which
brings new demands that impact daily the remotest villages and
reservations. Because
of these complications, this transition is forcing us to realign our
cultures
to fit the present educational, economic, political, and social
circumstances
in which we native minority language people find ourselves. However, I
believe
we can use the white man's education, as we Cheyennes refer to it, to our
advantage.
By manipulating the white man's
education
we can shape our cultures to our liking to fit our needs. After all, it is
the
white man's education and the way it was perpetrated on us that we have
objected to; we have never objected to learning itself. Manipulating the
white
man's education is a challenge. Let's not be discouraged. But above all,
let us
not say we do not want the white man's education. Though it was imposed on
us
insensitively, let's make it our own by giving it our own unique cultural
input
and making it relevant to our situations. Our languages and cultures will
have
a better chance of surviving if we have the same academic knowledge as the
dominant society.
1Recommended lists of books can be found at http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~jar/AIE/ICB.html.
|
| books | conferences | articles | columns | contact | links | index | home | |
| Copyright © 2006 Northern Arizona University, All rights reserved. |